In a SecurityWeek Cyber Insights 2026 analysis published on Jan. 27, Kevin Townsend looks at what’s known—and what’s still uncertain—about quantum’s impact on cybersecurity. The near-term takeaway is straightforward: today’s public-key cryptography won’t hold forever, and “harvest now, decrypt later” makes delayed action risky. The longer-term question is how quickly quantum capabilities advance, and whether increasingly powerful AI could accelerate both the technology—and the pace of cyber operations built on it.
What’s in the piece
- The expectation of PKC cryptanalysis: why RSA/ECC are ultimately breakable with Shor’s algorithm, and how uncertain timelines can encourage delayed action.
- “Harvest now, decrypt later” pressure: the incentive to steal encrypted sensitive data today for future decryption once quantum becomes capable.
- PQC as the practical defense: why post-quantum cryptography migration is a multi-year effort and needs a start-now posture.
- Quantum + advanced AI: how AI could accelerate quantum development and later automate quantum-enabled attacks and defenses.
- Quantum and AGI debate: competing viewpoints on whether AGI is imminent, and what quantum acceleration could mean for offensive/defensive cyber parity.
- Final thoughts: the piece lands on “prepare for the worst” planning—starting PQC migration and improving resilience now.
Why it matters
Even if “Q-Day” timing is unclear, the migration work is not. Crypto agility, inventorying where public-key cryptography lives, prioritizing long-lived sensitive data, and planning staged PQC adoption are the kinds of foundational moves that reduce future exposure—especially if adversaries are already collecting encrypted data for later decryption.
Key shifts highlighted
- From “quantum is future” → “quantum is planning-now”: uncertainty on dates is not a reason to delay multi-year cryptographic transition work.
- From static crypto → crypto agility: organizations need the ability to rotate algorithms/keys and modernize dependencies without breaking systems.
- From human-speed response → machine-speed operations: advanced automation (and eventually quantum-accelerated AI) may compress decision loops for both attackers and defenders.
- From perimeter focus → data protection resilience: long-lived sensitive data requires controls that hold up even if encrypted data is stolen today.
Protegrity POV (from the piece)
Arjun Kudinoor, quantum security advisor at Protegrity, notes that as quantum processors mature, they can begin accelerating AI workflows—creating a feedback loop where security must “learn and evolve” as quickly as emerging threats. The takeaway: quantum readiness isn’t only a cryptography project; it’s a broader governance and security posture shift toward adaptable controls.
How Protegrity helps
- Reduce sensitive-data exposure: protect data in place with tokenization, masking, and encryption so data remains usable while limiting breach impact.
- Support crypto modernization: help teams strengthen cryptographic posture and implement policy-driven protection that can evolve as standards shift.
- Enable AI-ready controls: apply consistent protection and governance before sensitive data is used across analytics and AI workflows.
Key takeaways
- Q-Day uncertainty is not a plan: PQC transition work is complex enough that “wait and see” creates compounding risk.
- AI changes the risk curve: it can accelerate both quantum progress and the automation of quantum-enabled cyber operations.
Note: This page summarizes a third-party article for convenience. For full context, please refer to the original source below.